Thursday, March 3, 2011

What is Terrorism?

Witnesses: Fresh air strikes hit eastern Libyan towns

By the CNN Wire Staff
March 3, 2011 7:17 a.m. EST
Click to play
Libya: Battle for Brega
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Eastern towns bombed in Libya, witnesses say
  • The International Criminal Court will announce an overview of the alleged war crimes
  • An Arab League statement rejects foreign intervention
  • Plans to investigate Gadhafi are not objective, a government spokesman says
Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- Two towns in eastern Libya were bombed for a second day Thursday, witnesses said, hours after the government denounced reports of attacks on protesters and military facilities.
Two bombs were dropped on military camps in Ajdabiya, a tribal leader said.
Another bomb fell in al-Brega between the oil facility and the airport Thursday, but there were no injuries or damage, witnesses said.
The attacks come a day after ground and air attacks on al-Brega, which has key oil and natural gas facilities.
Bombing in Libyan oil town
Gadhafi warns against intervention
Should U.S. arm Libyan rebels?
Libyan army reclaims crossing
On Wednesday, aircraft dropped bombs near the town and troops loyal to Moammar Gadhafi launched a ground attack, witnesses said. Aircraft also bombed military camps on the outskirts of Ajdabiya on the same day, witnesses said.
While CNN has staff in some cities, the network cannot independently confirm reports for many areas in Libya. CNN has gathered information through telephone interviews with witnesses.
Protesters calling for the ouster of longtime leader Gadhafi have taken to the streets for a third week amid clashes with government forces. He has been in power for nearly 42 years.
"We need tribal intervention, social intervention to help us convince these people to come to the negotiating table," Musa Ibrahim, the government spokesman, told CNN's "AC360."
"This is an armed rebellion, with people going around attacking police stations, army offices, getting a hold of guns and attacking."
The government spokesman said that assertions of military attacks on demonstrators are wrong. The government had supported peaceful protests, he said, but reiterated accusations that al Qaeda supporters have hijacked the movement and are triggering chaos.
"We have captured dozens of these people, we have figures, we have interviews, we are willing and prepared to take these people and show them on international media," the spokesman said.
More than 1,000 people are reported to have been killed and many more injured during the protests, according to the United Nations. Libya's ambassador to the United States has estimated that the death toll was about 2,000.
The International Criminal Court will announce Thursday an overview of the alleged war crimes since the protests started last month.
"Following a preliminary examination of available information, the prosecutor has reached the conclusion that an investigation is warranted," the ICC said in a statement.
Ibrahim slammed plans to investigate the alleged war crimes and said the decision was based on reports without any fact-finding mission into the country.
"The international community's reaction toward what is happening in Libya has not been very honest and transparent,"
he said.
"The Security Council, for example, based its agreement against Libya on reports without any fact-finding mission, without visiting Libya, without allowing Libya to defend itself."
US, allies debate no-fly zone for Libya
Libyan protests: Raw and online
CNN crew witnesses air bombing in Libya
Egyptian refugees escape Libya
RELATED TOPICS
Libya is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which created the ICC, and does not recognize the authority of the international court. But the United Nations Security Council referred the matter to the court, essentially giving it "jurisdiction" over the situation in Libya.
The clashes in Libya have gone on for days, with the bombings in al-Brega on Wednesday happening as Gadhafi addressed his supporters.
News of the bombings could support calls for the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya to prevent such attacks. The United States has said all options are on the table and is weighing a possible military role, but Arab League officials have also rejected foreign military intervention in Libya.
"We perceive what happened and what is happening is an internal affair that is decided by the people and their governments," the Arab League said in a statement.
Gadhafi spoke with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Tuesday about a proposal to bring an international mediation team to Libya, Venezuela's information minister said.
The demonstrations -- which follow protests in neighboring Egypt and Tunisia that ousted those countries' leaders -- have sparked criticism from world leaders.
Nations have scrambled to evacuate scores of citizens as the unrest continues.
The Netherlands defense ministry said Thursday that three Dutch navy personnel were captured by armed men loyal to Gadhafi during an evacuation operation Sunday. The ministry did not release information earlier because of safety reasons.
The capital city of Tripoli remains under Gadhafi's control, though opposition forces have taken control of the eastern city of Benghazi and a number of other cities.
The U.N. refugee agency reported that nearly 150,000 people had crossed Libya's borders into Egypt and Tunisia, and thousands more were arriving hourly at the borders.

16 comments:

  1. I believe that the rebels that want Gadhafi out of power need to stop protesting. Their only making matters worse for their children and themselves. The United States of America should not supply the rebels with weapons because who knows what may happen, it would be stupid for the US to do that."This is an armed rebellion, with people going around attacking police stations, army offices, getting a hold of guns and attacking."I don't quit understand whey Libyan refugees are going to Tunisia or Egypt because they to are going through the same situation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With serveral nation states government leaders ousted from their position, libian protesters look to do the same. Libian protester are fighting against the 42-year campiegn of Moammar Gadhafi. The death toll has been said to be in the range of one thousand and two thousand with many more ingured. Since Libia isn't a signatory of the "Rome Statue," libia doesnt see the ICC as the proper jurisdiction for the situation in Libia, this may play a key role in deciding what happens in Libia. By the looks of it protesters have a chance on over throwing Gadhafi; The government wi ll not make it easy though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i agree With "cece" the US should not supply guns to the protestor, The US should remain a nuetral party.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The people dont want Gadhafi in charge. They have been protesting their rights for a long time and wont stop until they get what they want. The protests are just causing violence and because of this many people, over 1,000 have died, and many others have ben injured. Something needs to be done to stop this, but it is difficult to find a peaceful way to solve things when people are not willing to listen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe the people of Libya need foreign support even if they choose no foreign help because this struggle to overthrow Gadhafi is causing many blood to be split and those who live to see another day mite end up living seeing nearly 150,000 people from Libya crossing the border into Egypt and Tunisia.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with cap8u. The U.S. should not supply guns. It should remain a neutral party.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with Crystal "it is difficult to find a peaceful way to solve things when people are not willing to listen"

    ReplyDelete
  8. In my opinion, all these protests are pointless for the fact that they are not getting anywhere with this but only making the situation much worse. These people are basically killing other innocent people for something that they BOTH want which does not make any sense to me. The UN has reported about 1000 deaths in the past 3 weeks, imagine if this keeps going for more weeks, or even months? It's not going to be pretty at all. And I think that these protest should just stop once and for all.
    Also, the US should not provide arms to anyone because that's just going to create more violence and there will be more deaths and yet still it isn't going to solve anything at all. And with all these refugees trying to get away from Libya there isn't going to be enough to support everyone at some point soon so basically they are making a bad situation transform into a much worse situation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I commend the bravery of the Libyan protesters, and their insistence on removing Gadhafi from power. I hope that they produce similar results in the likeness of Egypt and Tunisia, that this is the start of a new age of successful rebellions
    that these willful people are bringing about.

    In response to cece, yes it is unfortunate that they risk their safety, but I feel that it is pertinent in the process to overthrow an unjust, tyrannical, dictator that meets protests with unjust violence.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This article reminds me of the situation in darfur because in both places the government is using force unconciously since this might be the start of what we call genocide. I also feel that the US should not arm Libyan rebels because you never know how these people are going to use the weapons and it could be fatal.Netherlands should take more precaution with its people since three navy personnel were captured by armed men that are loyal to GADHAFI and everyone else should be very cautious.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with what "Cap8u" commented, the US should stay neutral in this situation.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree with cap8u, cece and crystal. No guns for Libya!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I hope the protesters continue to show their discontent with Gandhafi's rule. Although i wish there was a way for this to be done without bloodshed, i recognize that for demands to be met, there is no other way this story will play out. In regards with how the Libyan government is defending itself, i do think they have somewhat of a point, the UN should have done an investigation before they made their decision in the Security Council. The investigation should be done with the purpose of finding the truth out, because obviously there is always more than 1 side to the same story, and we don;t know how much is true of what either side is claiming. I think the Us should not remain neutral, and they should provide weapons to the protesters, in the long run it will prove beneficial to the US to have a potential democracy in that region of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  14. At Jennifer, and Christopher:
    I don't think the US will/should stay neutral, they haven't before and i don't think this is an exception. If anything there is greater reason for the US to support the protesters in the fact that this might lead to the rise of a democratic country in the Middle East.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To Eddie how can you even think that.If the US supplies Libya rebels with weapons won't the US just keep repeating stupid mistakes from the past. May I remind you of Saddam Hussien (?)

    ReplyDelete
  16. For these people of Libya, they can't wait for Gadhafi's retirement, [especially with his son; possibly dictatorship and monarchy] so I will have to agree with Libyans and for the quick and swift removal of the 42 years of regime.

    ReplyDelete